How to set up a successful photogrammetry project

Back to overview

Sketchfab Ambassador Abby Crawford is the owner of Archaeological Graphics. With over a decade of experience working on archaeological excavations and at museums, she is also an expert at digital reconstruction of 3D models, or photogrammetry. You will find examples of her work here on her Sketchfab profile.

Even though photogrammetry is a very accessible technology these days, getting great results requires good preparation. Today, Abby teaches us how to plan your project in her Photogrammetry Photography Primer.


Photogrammetry is the art and science of using overlapping photographs to reconstruct three dimensional scenes or objects. The practice has been around for over a century, but has become especially popular over the course of the past decade with the proliferation of digital cameras and free or relatively inexpensive, but accurate, processing software.

In this article we will cover the basics of photography as they pertain to capturing photos for photogrammetry. First we will discuss the necessary and recommended equipment, then move on to choosing subjects, setting up your shots, taking those shots, and, finally, getting your photos ready for processing in photogrammetry software.


It is possible to create successful 3D models from all sorts of cameras, from those housed in your phone to high-end digital single lens reflex (SLR) cameras, and everything in between. The better your camera’s resolution, the better the photos and resultant 3D model(s) will be. A minimum resolution of 5 megapixels is a good rule of thumb. For reference, an iPhone 6 has an 8 megapixel camera.

If you have a choice of lenses, it is best to pick a fixed focal length lens, e.g., 50mm. If you only have a variable focal length lens, just be sure to keep it at one specific length (either max or min) over the course of your shooting. If you have a point-and-shoot camera, simply avoid utilizing the zoom function during the course of your photography session. You should still be able to utilize autofocus.

Various parties have experimented with using fisheye and macro lenses for photogrammetry. Most photogrammetry software packages advise against fisheye and other such extreme wide-angle lenses because of the inherent distortion that they cause in photos. Macro lenses are rarely mentioned, but may prove less problematic than wide angle lenses.

If using your phone’s camera, the best photos utilize high dynamic range (HDR).

Stabilize your shots with a tripod

Optional equipment may be used to simplify or improve your photography:
A tripod is perhaps the most useful piece of equipment that you can have for photogrammetry apart from your camera and computer. Assuming it is properly set up and isn’t being bumped or windblown, your tripod should eliminate any blurriness in your photos due to user shakiness. The tripod also permits you to take photos with longer exposure times, which is important when you are trying to get maximum depth of field (which you should be!). It is possible to get tripods for less than $100, but their reliability and durability is frequently suspect. Consider your needs, what you can afford, and user reviews of tripods before purchasing one.

Along those same lines, a remote control for your camera may also be a good accessory to your tripod. Remotes are useful if you find yourself accidentally shaking or bumping the tripod-mounted camera when you press the shutter button. Remotes can be obtained relatively cheaply, with many costing less than $20.

A turntable is handy when you are able to lift your subject, want strict controls on lighting and/or do not have sufficient space around your subject to get 360 degrees of photos. Setting up a turntable permits you to arrange your tripod and/or lights in a static location. Any variety of turntable will work, but the size and weight of your subject should be taken into account when choosing equipment. While I generally use an inexpensive ($8) turntable, some turntables come equipped with degree marks around the edges, and even automated turning features. If such a turntable is used, leaving the turntable on continuous rotation is not recommended. Unless you are working with a quick shutter speed, movement from the turntable can cause blur in your images, thereby rendering them unusable.

Adding targets to your setup

In the event that you are having some trouble getting photos to align in the post-processing phases, you might consider adding targets to your shooting setup. The simplest version of this involves putting a piece of newsprint underneath your subject. The text and lines on the page will provide solid reference points onto which the photogrammetry software can latch. I use numbers attached to a cardboard backing, which allows me to place them around my subject and easily crop them out when I’m processing my model. If you end up using targets, you must remember not to move them during the course of your photography session; doing so will cause photo alignment problems down the road.

A circular polarizing filter (CPF) is recommended when you are shooting shiny/reflective objects. It will reduce the bright spot(s) caused by reflection. It should be noted that CPFs tend to be ineffective on metallic surfaces.

Without using a circular polarizing filter (CPF)

Without CPF

Using a circular polarizing filter (CPF)

With CPF

Additional lights are dealt with later in this guide.

Choosing a subject

Not all photogrammetry subjects are created equal. Since photogrammetry software relies upon matching up common points between photographs, you may have trouble successfully reconstructing certain types of objects. Thus, it is best to avoid objects that are: untextured, completely flat, very thin, transparent, shiny, and/or reflective. Examples of difficult-to-capture objects are leafy plants, fur and hair, glass items, and shiny or sparkly Christmas ornaments.

Bad subjects

Bad subjects

Conversely, solid, matte, textured objects are much better subjects. Examples include tree trunks, rocks, and sculptures.

Good subjects

Good subjects

Shooting conditions:

Ideally, your subject will be evenly lit and perfectly still. If a portion of the subject is in dark shadow, that shadowy portion may manifest itself as a hole in the mesh later in processing. If part of your subject moves (e.g., folds of a skirt or shadows created by a flash), the software used to process your photographs will ultimately be unable to match points between photographs, thereby causing gaps or irregularities in the final mesh.

There are a variety of workarounds to enhance lighting in difficult situations. If you have spotlights handy, you can set those up around an object. LED panels exist that can be attached to a tripod or to a camera’s flash mount (examples can be found here and here). With any light, you want to be able to adjust it – either by dimming or by moving it farther away from your subject – in order to keep harsh shadows to a minimum. Be aware that if shadows on the object shift because of your changing position, point-matching problems may occur during model processing.

If you are shooting outside, pay attention to the effect of wind on your subject, and any changing cloud or sunlight conditions. If you suspect that wind may move all or part of your subject, try to relocate to a more sheltered location or create a windbreak around the object. If the sun is creating harsh shadows or your subject is alternating in and out of shadow, try using a plastic sheet or sheer fabric to create shade for your subject (example here). In some cases this solution may require assistance from others.

Examples of good shooting situations are:

  • outside on an overcast/cloudy day
  • inside with diffuse 360 degree lighting

Camera positioning and shooting

The question of how many photos you need to take depends on the size and complexity of your subject. Of those photos that you have taken, how many you can use will depend on the limitations of your computer and/or the photogrammetry software that you are using. It will likely take some trial and error for you to figure out what your computer can handle and how much time you are willing to put into processing models. When in doubt – and particularly when you may not be able to return to your subject – take more photos than you might need. Superfluous photos can always be removed prior to processing, but new photos can never magically appear.

Despite there being no hard and fast rules regarding the number of photos to take, some rules of thumb should govern your photo taking.

First, it is important to capture a photo roughly every 10-15 degrees (horizontally and vertically):

Top view

Front view

Second, there should be roughly 60% overlap between photos. Without overlap the software will be unable to identify the same points in different photos, and will then be unable to create an accurate 3D model. There is no harm in having more overlap, but it’s best to avoid having less overlap than 50-60%.

Provide enough overlap between pictures

In some cases you will be photographing subjects that have complex topography – holes, overhangs, protrusions, etc. It is important to capture all sides of all features in order to achieve an accurate final product. Before beginning shooting, examine your subject and consider the extra angles and shots that you may have to include for full coverage. If your subject has sharp corners, you might want take a few more photos of them than you would otherwise, in order to capture the exact parameters of the corners.


After having taken your photos, it is important to go through them and ensure that any blurry or unfocused shots are removed. These images will not align properly and may adversely affect the alignment of other photos.

In many instances you may find that processing is sped up or less confused when you mask your photos. “Masking” serves to block off portions of an image or images that you do not want included in photo alignment or texture generation. The shape that your masks take will vary depending upon your needs. For instance, it may be that something appears in the foreground that you do not want to appear in your model. The masked section(s) will be excluded from point cloud generation. In the photo below, a tombstone in the foreground is masked out in order that it not interfere with the subject of the photo session.

Post processing: masking your images

In other instances, you may have to mask out everything except your subject. This may be the case if you are using a turntable or there is little definition between subject and background. Depending on the size of your photoset, masking can be a time intensive process. Some softwares manage processing fine without extensive masking, while for others it is a key part of the process. While many softwares have masking capabilities built in, others do not (e.g., Autodesk ReCap). When working with these softwares it is necessary to mask in another program, such as Adobe Photoshop. In many cases it is best to weigh the necessity of masking the photos against the time that would be involved to do it.


In this brief essay you have learned the equipment and steps necessary to begin creating a 3D model in photogrammetry software. Hopefully the tips and tricks included here will help you to take better shots and process models more successfully!

About the author

Sketchfab Team


  • Aydın says:


  • Pablo Collazos says:

    Am i missing something in the “Shooting conditions:” i can’t find the links were it says (examples can be found here and here) and (example here).

  • Damon Chen says:

    what photo file format that able upload to Sketchfab?


  • Bart Veldhuizen says:

    Hi Damon,

    you have to reconstruct 3D models from photo’s first – Sketchfab does not do that for you. You can read more about that in this tutorial:

  • Bart Veldhuizen says:

    Oh great catch! I’ve added the links, thanks for reporting 🙂

  • Gwan says:

    What’s the best photogrammetry software to use to stitch photos together?

  • Abby says:

    Hi Gwan. The best software depends on your needs and budget. I recommend checking out the software comparison thread in the Forum:

  • ndaru says:

    Which one is better… using colored background or just plain white?

  • Abby says:

    White is usually a good choice, but if the subject of your model is white, you might do well to choose a different colored background.

  • Alex Ball says:

    I would recommend Heinrich Mallison and Oliver Wings excellent paper on photogrammetry published in the Journal of Palaeontological Techniques (, plus dinosaurs!!

    One tip worth sharing is that in most cases the light comes from above, you might want to bring along a reflector and cast some light onto the subject to light shadows.

  • Jordan Raychev says:

    Interesting and very informative article. Highly appreciate it!

  • Swannjie says:

    Thank you very much, very informative! What do you think of scanning a large plank w subtle curves at 120cm long x 6cm x 20cm approx? Do you recommend any specific set up? This is to reproduce a model so I could maybe do 3d printing after the scan. Thanks in advance


  • Ryan Morra says:

    Anyone have a good recommendation for a cheap camera that gets a sharp enough photo for photogrammetry. I’ve used two cyber shots by Sony and only one yielded a high res model, but it’s a little outside of my budget.

  • Great article, thanks! Would you know if any of the softwares is suitable to measure the volume of the object after the 3D model has been created. Of course, we could incorporate some ‘rulers’ horizontally and vertically on the object, but still it will not be possible / easy to estimate the volume without a software.

  • Hi George, I am not sure what software you are using but both Agisoft PhotoScan and Autodesk’s ReMake offer volume measurement tools. Both assume you have set the correct scale for your model in the software. You can read more on the Agisoft site ( and in the ReMake manual (

  • Thanks a lot for the answer; I am still a ‘to be’ user, but your answer will enhance things.

  • Ryan Spearman says:


    Have you ever heard of anyone using real time close range stereo photogrammetry to make a range finder. I would love to try it out, but I have no idea how.

    Do you know of anyone that could help?

  • Nick Geddes says:

    Thank you Ms. Crawford and Sketchfab for this very helpful article on photogrammetry techniques. It contains a lot of great tips and suggestions on how to achieve great results for my future photogrammetry projects. Looking forward to going forward (with more confidence) with my projects.

  • Wm says:

    Hi Swannjie, did you get a good technique for this object? I am doing something of similar proportions (but about 10 times larger) and thinking about either rotating my camera around a few points or moving along parallel to the object. Thanks in advance!


  • Jed says:

    I’m trying to setup a static background for smaller objects. What color would you recommend for a screen?

  • Hi Jed – it will depend on your subject. You’ll want some good contrast to help separate the subject from the background i.e. if it’s a white subject, use a black background and vice versa. If you use a coloured backdrop (green or blue screen) be sure to watch out for reflected, coloured light on your subject.

  • Mike says:

    Any suggestions for lighting or other techniques to reduce highlights/reflections on shiny objects, beyond the CPF filter? (objects must be shot) Thanks.

  • Hey Mike – there’s a good thread on the Forum about this with various suggested solutions:

  • Paul says:

    I have a featureless smooth surface as a subject (a rubber sheet for capturing object impressions), but I will apply/print a pattern to the sheet. Is there an optimal pattern for the software to distinguish features and shared parts? Should the resolution of the pattern be similar to the pixel resolution?

  • That’s an interesting workflow! I think you would want the pattern to actually be asymmetrical (i.e. non-repeating), fairly detailed (i.e. no large blocks of single colour) and the image should be as high a resolution as possible. Maybe other people have advice to share as well – you could always post this question in the Forum too

  • Hey there, I think your blog might be having browser compatibility issues.
    When I look at your blog in Firefox, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, awesome blog!

  • Thanks for the info. Microsoft Internet Explorer is not supported by most websites, included – development for IE has been discontinued my Microsoft themselves too.

  • DaveM says:

    If you nicely light a subject, you have to move the camera around on a tripod, which is a laborious and sometimes impossible task.

    If you do this and rotate the subject, then the lighting changes with each turn, which could make matching hard? And I assume some shadow actually helps with matching.

    So given those two options, which is best, or, if lit with softboxes etc, do the shadows make little difference?

  • I am using an o,d Canon Eos 50d, should be pretty cheap on ebay as its from 2008. I´m getting pretty decent results with meshroom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

"Post comment" will create a new comment that can be read by anyone who visits this website and has access to this topic. Do not include sensitive data like IDs, credentials, or non-public information.

To remove a comment, contact the Sketchfab Community Team.

Related articles